—————————————————————————————————–
Simplification is ordre du jour across Europe, as the imperative to boost competitiveness trumps climate considerations. But rail companies missed the memo, and instead are digging in their heels as the Commission unveils a plan to unify rail networks between EU members.
Any rail passenger travelling from Brussels will understand the case for a simplified ticketing system. In just one hour you’re crossing into a neighbouring country, with its own ticket vendors and timetables – often frustratingly incompatible. Before we even start the debate about high-speed infrastructure or modern rolling stock, consumers are forced to negotiate the tapestry of ticket sites to figure out the best route, pay multiple booking fees, and pray they don’t miss a connection (or build in extra time).
A few dedicated train nerds have compiled laughably long guides to navigate the labyrinth of Europe’s rail networks. But it’s one heck of a mission. Throw in the unfair advantage afforded to airlines (which enjoy tax breaks on ticket sales and kerosene) and it’s no surprise that plenty of well-intentioned folks opt to fly.
The argument against integrating booking systems, the director of the lobby for major European rail companies told Euractiv’s Stefano Porciello, is a fear that this would create a situation similar to the hotel industry – namely, would concentrate bookings in a few large online platforms, which then would exploit their advantage. Which sounds a bit rich, coming from the companies fighting to defend their monopoly.
Transport commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikōstas went even further, suggesting that a booking system that would even harmonise other transport modes – flying included. For passengers this would be a huge win, tangible proof of the benefits of a union, one that its citizens can appreciate without unnecessary inconvenience.
Roundup
Von der Leyen and Metsola meeting – The two EU leaders will meet on Monday to discuss the next long-term budget following Parliament’s strong opposition to the proposal to merge farm and regional subsidies into national programmes.
More AI regulation – A draft of the upcoming digital omnibus suggests the Commission will centralise enforcement of the EU’s AI Act within its own AI office, “empowered to take appropriate measures and decisions to adequately exercise its powers [as a watchdog authority]”. Additional powers would be formalised in a separate legal act.
GDPR changes – The Commission is seeking far-reaching changes to EU data laws across as part of an effort to reduce privacy compliance for companies.
Across Europe
Merz’s migration dilemma – Parts of Syria are currently too devastated for immigrants living in Germany to return, according to Foreign Minister Johann Wadephu. His position conflicts with Merz’s pledge to step up repatriations, in efforts to counter the increasingly popular far-right AfD, which has been calling for “remigration”.
North-South tensions over migrant management – Belgium and the Netherlands are urging the Commission to enforce the Dublin asylum rules – which stipulate that asylum seekers should be processed in the first EU country they enter.But the new EU Migration Pact establishes a system to share asylum responsibilities across the bloc through relocations, financial contributions, or operational support.
Russia redraws the lines of victory – The tone in Russia’s defence has changed. A 1945-style victory may not be possible, but the nation’s hardliners are pivoting to a war on many fronts, argues Euractiv columnist Chris Kremidas-Courtney.
